a two page article critique written about the following article: Prisoner Reentry Research From 2000 to 2010: Results of a Narrative Review, written by Benjamin J. Wright, Sheldon X. Zhang, David Farabee, and Rick Braatz Part 1: Identification of the article: What is important here is that you provide the reader with enough information about your article so that they will be able to locate it. Part 2: Summary: List the main points that the author has tried to establish, (i.e., 1, 2, 3 or first, second, third). There normally will be at least 6 to 8 main points. If you are summarizing a court case, for example, you should discuss the following: What provision of the law was at issue? Briefly state the facts of the case. What Legal tests were applied? Were there any unusual elements in the case? Part 3: Your critique: You are to provide your reaction (insightful, critical, and logical) to the points that the author tried to make, or an overall critique of the entire article. A simple statement of agreement or disagreement is not sufficient. While you may make such a statement by way of introduction to your reaction, you must clearly and logically state the reasons for the position that you have taken.