Assignment #1 Select two variables of interest (wi Assignment Help

Assignment #1 Select two variables of interest (wi Assignment Help

Module Aims The purpose of this module is to develop students knowledge of effective and academic research design at master s level and provide guidance on the purpose and design of literature reviews, strategies of research problem definition and ethical considerations. Equally, the module aims to ensure students have an advanced understanding of how the range of qualitative and quantitative approaches can be most appropriately applied in business and management (sub) contexts; and to develop students ability to identify/collect and analyse relevant data and literature sources and reference them appropriately. Finally, to help students apply this knowledge and establish the most effectual research design and method for their project, and write a successful research proposal.Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: LO1 demonstrate a critical awareness of the different business and management research methodologies, research design and methods, and different paradigms on which they are based; LO2 critically evaluate the range of data and information collection and analysis methods that are used within business and management in general and their project subject specialism in particular, and make informed decisions about their relevance for different purposes; LO3 understand the research and supervision process and the responsibilities of student and supervisor, including research ethics considerations; LO4 draw upon academic and practitioner literature to support and justify the selection of appropriate research question(s), research design, methods, and analysis; LO5 write a research proposal that outlines and evaluates the most appropriate research design and method(s) to investigate the chosen research question(s); LO6 structure and produce a research proposal that demonstrates a writing style appropriate to the business and management discipline and to an acceptable standard of written Business English.Indicative Syllabus Content Identifying research topic / research problem. Research design the ontological and epistemological issues. Major types of research design in business and management and implications for data collection and analysis. Appreciation of variation in dominant method of enquiry and discourse within business and management sub-disciplines or fields. Reviewing literature, using library resources, Harvard standard referencing. Research ethics. Main methods of qualitative and quantitative data collection (including primary and secondary data). Main methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis including use of specific software packages. Researching within organisations: access issues and managing client relationships. Project management: managing research; time management; communication with supervisor; writing up. Preparing the research proposal document.Teaching and Learning Methods The module is planned as a combination of lectures, smaller interactive sessions, individual meetings, and some intensive workshops employing a range of methods suited to the different learning objectives. The lectures will only provide an outline of the topics. Students are expected to participate fully in all sessions and supplement their learning with additional reading in the main textbook and additional resources on Blackboard. It is essential that students read widely around the basic programme. A list of recommended further reading is included in section 13 below. This is indicative only and the student may wish to make his/her own selection. Handouts and other teaching materials will also be made available. Please note that to complete this module successfully it is imperative to undertake further reading in addition to the recommended texts. The lectures, seminars and group activities can only introduce you to the subject; private study is also required. Maximising your learning from this module In UK higher education, you as the student take primary responsibility for your own learning. So-called contact time involving interaction with, or supervision from, teaching and associated staff is there to help shape and guide your studies. It may be used to introduce new ideas and equip you with certain knowledge or skills, demonstrate practical skills for you to practise independently, offer guidance on project work, or to provide personalised feedback. It may be face-to-face or mediated through other channels. Alongside contact time, your private or independent study is very significant. This is the time that you spend learning without direct supervision from, or contact with a member of staff and this makes up the bulk of your studies. It is likely to include background reading, preparation for seminars or tutorials, follow-up work, wider practice, the completion of assignments, revision, and so on. This independent study may have been structured for you as a key part of your learning, or it may be additional study you choose to undertake to improve your learning. (Based in part on: QAA (2011) Contact hours: a guide for students. p.2). Activity type Category Student learning and teaching hours* Lecture Scheduled 10 hours Seminar Scheduled 15 hours Tutorial Scheduled 1 hour Project supervisor Scheduled 2 hours Practical Classes and workshops Scheduled 3 hours Fieldwork Scheduled 12 hours (Residential weekend or Away Day) External visits Scheduled 27 hours (communicating/ contacting potential organisations for researching) Total Scheduled 70 hours Assessment Independent 60 hours Independent study Independent 70 hours Total student learning and teaching hours 200 hours Blackboard Module Site The module Blackboard site will have further important module information. Please access it regularly for announcements, module information, research resources and assessment information. Please note that it is your responsibility to download and bring the relevant materials to lectures and seminars. You will also be required to submit your coursework electronically via Blackboard under submit coursework menu option. The e-copy of the assignment will be checked for plagiarism via Turnitin. To access Blackboard, go to the university homepagesign in [top right corner] and click on the Blackboard under the Applications menu.Link to your Project Module The research methods (RM) module is a separate module from the Project module, but they are interlinked: RM is a prerequisite for the project module and you are required to get a minimum of 50% for your research proposal. Your research proposal is 100% of the module mark and it will be marked by your project supervisor. Your proposal should form a major part of your project dissertation.Submission of Project Topic Form (PTF) As part of your Project Module you will be assigned a Project Supervisor who will support you in the process of your project submission, which is an independent piece of research. In order to be able to allocate you a project supervisor broadly relevant to your project topic, we ask you to submit a Project Topic Form by following the link on Blackboard. Please note: think seriously about the feasibility and suitability of your suggested research topic before submission of this form. Your research question/area can still slightly evolve after submission of this form, but cannot change drastically, and must remain within the capabilities/knowledge of your supervisor. It is not possible to change supervisors once they have been allocated. While not assessed, submission is essential for the allocation of your supervisor. Any delay in submission will result in an automatic delay of your supervisor allocation. The contact details of your project supervisor will be published on the Blackboard under Project Supervisor Allocation menu as well as on SRS web. This is when your Research Methods module ends and Project Module starts.Assessment Assessment Methods and Weighting Type of assessment Weighting % Qualifying mark/set % Project proposal 100% as per standard PG Summary: The overall assessment mark for the module is based solely on your coursework (weight: 100%). The overall pass mark for the module is 50% minimum. Your Project Proposal will be marked by your allocated Project Supervisor, and independently second marked. You should arrange to meet with your supervisor before you submit your proposal. Word count: 3000 3,500 words maximum (excluding references and title page). Proposal feedback: You will receive feedback on your proposal via your project supervisor. Three to four weeks after the submission of your coursework, you will have the opportunity to arrange a meeting with your project supervisor to discuss your project proposal. The onus is on you to arrange that meeting. By the time of this meeting, the project proposal is marked/second marked and the mark will be available. This mark remains provisional until it is confirmed by the relevant subject board. Your confirmed coursework mark will be available on your SRS web record after the relevant subject board. The written feedback on your coursework will be made available either: (1) via online feedback written on your e-copy of the coursework, retrievable from the TurnitinUK submission menu on the module Blackboard site, OR (2) via a typed coursework feedback sheet given to you in e-copy or hard copy by your supervisor. 10.1 Submission of Coursework Unless explicitly stated otherwise in writing by the module leader, all coursework on this module is submitted via Blackboard only. It will automatically be scanned through a text matching system (designed to check for possible plagiarism). YOU MUST include your name and student ID on the first page of your assignment; The coursework should be submitted through ONE electronic copy; File Format: MICROSOFT WORD; Line spacing: 1.5 line spacing. To submit your assignment: Click on the Submit Coursework link in the navigation menu on the left-hand side, as advised by the module teaching team; Click on the link for the relevant assignment; Follow the instructions. Finance holds. If on the due date you have a finance hold on your student account, you may not be able to access Blackboard to be able to submit electronically. If this is the case, you may be able to submit a paper copy to the Registry. Assignments submitted this way will ONLY be accepted if it is clear that you have a finance hold on the due date. The penalties for late submission will still apply. You will be given details by the module teaching team about how and when you will receive your marks and feedback on your work. REMEMBER: It is a requirement that you submit your work in this way. All coursework must be submitted by 1.00 p.m. (13.00) UK time on the due date. If you submit your coursework late but within 24 hours or one working day of the specified deadline, 10% of the overall marks available for that element of assessment will be deducted, as a penalty for late submission, except for work which is marked in the range 50 59%, in which case the mark will be capped at the pass mark (50%). If you submit your coursework more than 24 hours or more than one working day after the specified deadline you will be given a mark of zero for the work in question. The University s mitigating circumstances procedures relating to the non-submission or late submission of coursework apply to all coursework. In order to avoid any potential technical problems or difficulties with networks and software, you are strongly encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the due date. NON SUBMISSION OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT WILL RESULT IN THE AWARD OF 0%. 10.2 Assignment Brief Topic/Title of your Project proposal: The Project Proposal is based on the research topic you submitted on the Project Topic Form (PTF). Structure and Contents of your Project Proposal: The Project Proposal is an outline of your intended Project, providing information on the ?What, Why, How conceptually and How practically [1] of your research idea. It will effectively be an introduction, a literature review and will include an outline of your research method/methodology. The purpose is to show the reader you have managed to arrange your broad Project research ideas into a logical account of research intention; and that these plans are justifiable and achievable. It requires you to think clearly about your research objectives, research methods and relevant literature. Proposals should comprise the following areas: Title Introduction/context/research area/main research question Literature review Research questions/objectives or hypotheses Research design (methodology and methods) Data collection and analysis Conclusion/limitations, including an identification of contingency plans, where relevant; and resource requirements Time line/Gantt chart WBS student research ethics consideration form (via VRE) References Detailed outline: [2]Title of your Project Proposal: Reflect as accurately as possible the content of your proposalIntroduction to the research: context-background This section should describe the area you will be investigating and explain the rationale and the context for your research plans. Explain why you are interested in the research topic, and why it is worthwhile. You should provide sufficient background information on the issues you want to research for the reader to be able to understand the rest of your Project as well as its value. If you focus on an organisation you should provide enough organisational information to put your research plans into context. iii. Review of the literature This should be presented under a separate heading. Through this review, you show that you have acquired knowledge about the literature that relates to your research area and identify the research/gaps, which your research relates to. It is not intended as a near-finished comprehensive critical analysis of the literature at this stage. In the Project Proposal, provide an identification of themes from academic and other relevant recent and/or historically important literature, which acts as the basis for your intended study and, most importantly, clarify where your intended study fits into this debate. It is important that you include key relevant literature, with references to key texts and especially refereed journal articles (RJA). Normally we would expect 10-12 references of RJAs at least.Specific research questions Here or at the end of the literature review section, clarify the link between the previous research done in your field of interest, and your research focus. Specific research questions: this may be one overall question or a number of key questions that the research will address. If suitable, you could add research objectives which make it clear to the reader exactly what is being planned by the proposed research: identifying what is to be analysed, and to what purpose. Your questions and objectives should provide sufficient scope for a project of this size, but also be achievable within the resources available to you. They should not be vague or too general and should be leading to observable outcomes. The research questions and objectives will be used by the reader to judge the rest of your proposal, so make sure that your proposed research design, data collection and analysis fit with these. If relevant and suitable, the research questions could be formulated as hypotheses. Please refer to: Punch (2006) for more guidance on hypotheses. Blooms taxonomy of verbs to identify more masters level active verbs you could use as part of your research questions.Research design, methodology, and method This refers to an overall view of the methodology, design and methods chosen to answer your research questions and achieve your research objectives, as well as a justification of these choices. Provide information and justification for the methodology and research design you propose. Methodology refers to the broad approach you plan to take issues such as positivism or interpretivism; inductive or deductive; qualitative or quantitative or mixed methods; etc. You also need to outline and justify your research design: for instance, case study; cross-sectional survey; action research; ethnographic study, etc. If relevant, it should also detail particular areas your research will focus on, such as sectors of industry, regions, organizations and the characteristics of your research population. Data/information requirements: Identify from your research questions, objectives or hypothesis, what main data or information you will need to acquire to be able to answer these. If no empirical data is needed, make this clear.Data collection and analysis Provide details of the way in which you intend to collect the data: for instance investigation of secondary data, interviews, focus groups, observation, document analysis, or a combination, and the way you intend to analyse the data. It is essential to explain why you have chosen this approach, and reflect upon whether this is the most effective way to answer your research questions. Be as precise as possible. For instance: regarding secondary data, specify the exact data sources you intend to use; for questionnaires specify the distribution, population, sample size, likely response rate; for interviews specify interview population, intended interview duration and way of analysis, etcetera. Refer to ethical good practice such as referring to the use of consent forms and participant info sheets when relevant. vii. Reflecting on resources Reflect on data availability and provide clear information on access to the data collected/used. Have you made sure all necessary data is available to you? If relevant, do you have the agreement of essential people to use certain data or conduct interviews? Is your Project agreed with the organisation you focus on if this is necessary? Is your survey response rate likely to be satisfactory? Reflect on time resources: a rough schedule of the tasks to complete between the submission of the Project Proposal and the submission of the Project, through a GANTT chart. Other resources you may want to reflect on may include skills or software necessary to collect or analyse data. viii. Conclusion, limitations, including an identification of contingency plans, where relevant. Conclusion includes a brief overview of expected outcomes. If access to (parts of) the data is still uncertain, reflect on possible alternative ways to collect data to answer the research question.WBS student research ethics consideration form Online arrangements for the ethics consideration process for PG students, via the Virtual Research Environment (VRE, part of Intranet). To submit an ethics application you should: click on My record on the right of the homepage click on Ethics on the right of the record You will be asked to enter the name of your supervisor when submitting an ethics application. Upon submission, the application is sent to your supervisor. Further information is available on Blackboard.List of references All references should be in Harvard standard, both in text and in the final referencing list. 10.3 A general guide to grading Above 80 per cent (Distinction) Publishable quality of work, an outstanding report/ answer in every regard, with exceptional command of the material. Nothing more could reasonably be expected of the student within the constraints under which work was prepared. 70 79 per cent (Distinction) An excellent answer with a high level of critical analysis, and where literature has been challenged and/or evaluated. Excellent referencing and evidence of a wide knowledge of the subject; sound and original conclusions and high quality presentation. 60 69 per cent (Merit) A sound answer showing good knowledge of the subject and displaying a well-rounded and critical understanding of the issues involved. However, analysis of the key issues could be better. 50 59 per cent (Pass) The answer tends to be more descriptive than analytical and, whilst the information is provided, it is not always relevant or integrated effectively into the answer. A basic understanding of the subject is, however, still shown but there is a need for more critical discussion. 40 49 per cent (Fail Resubmit) Some information and relevant discussion but the approach is muddled or incomplete. Whilst some elements are provided, the basic knowledge revealed is insufficient. However, in some cases, a pass standard could be reached with relatively slight improvement. In others, fundamental aspects of the question may be missed or major areas of the subject may be absent with no indication of a real grasp of the issues involved. Below 40% (Fail Retake module) Failure to understand the assignment. The work provides little relevant information and is unstructured and often irrelevant. 10.4 Assessment Rationale This module supports you in the development of your research knowledge and skills; alongside the relationship with your Project Supervisor, where the emphasis is on the development of a focused piece of work, which is highly subject-specific. Therefore, whilst there is a need here to focus assessment on your understanding of academic research development, it is important to make sure that you: have a breadth of critical understanding across a range of methodological approaches to research design, collection and analysis; can demonstrate a critical evaluation as well as an application of the taught aspects of the research methods module through an individual project proposal justifying full description of appropriate methods and techniques for the project. There is a need to focus on and provide formal feedback on the academic standard and viability of the student s project proposal at an early stage in the project development. Therefore, the totality of assessment in this module is through the student research project proposal, which must address the entire module learning outcomes. During the run of this module, the student is assigned an individual project supervisor who provides guidance in the development of the project proposal and in the further development of the master s student project itself. The latter is not part of this module, but part of the subject specific Project module. 10.5 Assessment Criteria The student s project proposal assesses students on the extent to which they are able to demonstrate advanced understanding of the elements which are important in business and management including research design and process; review of literature; data identification/collection and analysis; presentation of analysis, providing clear reasons for choices made. demonstrate critical evaluation and application of the business and management research knowledge through their own research project proposal in which they: identify, define and justify research objectives which are both worthy of and capable of investigation within the resources and time available; provide an initial review of academic/practitioner literature relevant to their research that places their work into context of work already published; design a methodology of enquiry appropriate to their proposed investigation and taking account of the contextual ethical considerations; identify specific research questions, propositions and/or hypotheses to guide the investigation; determine and justify data and information collection methods along with initial strategies for data analysis; appreciate the likely limitations of the study and determine contingency plans; demonstrate familiarity with the theories, frameworks and authors, and cite from such work; demonstrate the ability to reference according to the Harvard standard. 10.6 Checklist Appropriate and clear background, context for the research. An initial review of literature relevant to the research that places the proposed research into context of work already published. Clarification and suitability of research questions, to guide the investigation. Outline and justification of research methodology and design appropriate to the proposed Investigation. Outline and justification of data required; data collection methods; taking account of ethical considerations. Reflection on resources, the likely limitations of the study and determine contingency plans. Extent to which all parts of the research proposal fit together. Viability of the research proposal: worthy and capable of investigation within the resources and time available. Reference according to the Harvard standard, in text and in final list. A writing style appropriate for a Master s level project. Ethics consideration confirmation.Module Plan Learning week Session topic LW1 Lecture: Introduction to module Seminar: considering possible topics LW2 Lecture: Identifying the research topic Seminar: formulating and clarifying the research topic/questions/objectives LW3 Lecture: Research Methodology Qualitative and quantitative research Seminar: case study LW4 Lecture: Literature review (EndNote) Seminar: case study and critical review LW5 Lecture: Qualitative data collection and analysis (Nvivo) Seminar: interview techniques and coding exercises LW6 Individual drop-in surgery with staff members: deciding research topic and presenting a list of literature to be reviewed LW7 Lecture: Quantitative data collection and analysis (SPSS) Seminar: questionnaire design LW8 SPSS lecture and practice LW9 Lecture: Proposal writing Seminar: what is a good proposal? LW10 Lecture: Research ethics Seminar: how to prepare participation information sheet and consent form LW11 Research sharing talks LW12 Research topic form submission workshopSchedule Introduction and identifying the research topic Relevant core textbook chapter 2 This session provides an overview of the module and practical information. Focus of the session: generate ideas and explore sources that will help you to choose a suitable research topic and identify the attributes of a good research topic. Research methodology: qualitative and quantitative research Relevant core textbook chapter 4 This session will give a brief introduction to research philosophical perspectives and approaches to research (qualitative; quantitative; mixed methods). Focus of the session: distinguish between deductive and inductive research approaches and their respective advantages and disadvantages. Seminar: case study Literature review Relevant core textbook chapter 3 This session will explore the importance of a critical literature review; using advanced scholarship and theory; and searching for relevant literature. Focus of the session: discuss the development of critical analysis and building arguments and substantiation as a necessary condition for successful research. Seminar on reviewing literature will provide a practical approach to this topic. Five critical synopsis questions from Wallace and Wray (2011) will be introduced to students to help them develop critical reading and writing. Students try out conducting a preliminary and in-depth critical analysis of an academic article. Qualitative data collection and analysis Relevant core textbook chapters 9,10,13 This session will consider various qualitative data collection and analysis strategies and assesses the context within which these may be effective. Focus of the session: Qualitative methods of data collection (primary and secondary): interview techniques, observations and focus groups. Qualitative methods of analysis: recording and transcribing of qualitative data; grounded theory, interpretation and presentation; qualitative software analysis packages, for example, Nvivo. Seminar: (1) In-depth interview techniques as a method of data collection for qualitative research which aims to highlight some of the potential problems when organising interviews and analysing the data. (2) Coding exercise which aims to help students to identify possible categories that might form the basis of analysis. Quantitative data collection and analysis Relevant core textbook chapters 11, 12 This session considers various quantitative data collection and analysis strategies and assesses the context within which these may be effective. Focus of the session: Quantitative methods of data collection (primary and secondary): questionnaire design and sampling methods. Quantitative methods of data analysis, for example, hypothesis testing, t-test, correlation, etc. Seminar: questionnaire design, highlighting some of the most common mistakes and good practice when building a survey questionnaire. Proposal writing Relevant core textbook chapter 14 This session will be organised to discuss good practice in research proposal writing and relevant research methodology. The presentation of findings in your final project will also be discussed. Seminar: identify and discuss good practice through marking various proposal samples. Research ethics Relevant core textbook chapter 6 This session will be organised to discuss the importance of research ethics and the need to act ethically, and the principles of data protection and data management. Seminar: discuss how to prepare participation information sheet and consent form. Research sharing talks Research leaders from various departments and seminar leaders will give talks about research in their subject areas and also their own research experiences in their specialised fields. After the talks, there will be a question time, when questions can be asked and opinions shared on how to carry out effective research. Individual drop-in meetings You can make an appointment to see your seminar tutor to ask questions concerning the choice of your project topic, and the proposal writing. It is important that you prepare for this meeting, reflecting on possible project topics/research questions, and have questions ready to ask the member of the module team. It is not supposed to be a joint brainstorming session.Reading List Core textbook Saunders, N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2012), Research Methods for Business Students, 6th edition, Pearson. Online student resources: http://wps.pearsoned.co.u


Comments are closed.