endangered species Original Essay Help

endangered species Original Essay Help

314LON Coursework 1 Read the news announcement SABMiller and AB InBev agreement in principle and extension of PUSU deadline from SABMiller website (enclosed 7 page case study) to perform the following tasks of analysis and write up your finding in a report format. You are encouraged to conduct research on the effects of the news on share price. All related regulatory announcements can be found (as of 3 December 2015) at the following website: https://www.sabmiller.com/investors/ABInBev-Possible-Offer Conduct in-depth background research to enhance the analysis of the acquisition event. Such research should demonstrate in-depth understanding on the working of the sector. You should set up a timeline to reflect the chronicle of events based on key dates. (30%) Conduct comprehensive valuation on SABMiller prior to the acquisition announcement. Your valuation should use relevant valuation technique(s) to arrive at an appropriately discounted present value (per share) for SABMiller and AB InBev. (35%) Evaluate the extent of price impacts on SABMiller and AB InBev following the news announcements on acquisition. Does the movement of share price reflect the insights from Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)? (35%) ( Timeline: the first announcement event occurred on 16 September 2015 and the cut-off time of your analytical timeline is 3 December 2015. Organize your findings in a Report format according to the weight presented. The length should be no longer than 2,500 words. The minimum length of your report should be no less than 1500. You need to provide data and valuation result in Excel format as evidence in the appendix. Your Excel model also needs to be sent separately to me and seminar tutor by email so that we can comment and verify your model based on your submitted paper. References and appendixes will not be included in the final word count. Coursework Submission Students are required to submit online using the Turnitin link on Moodle. Coursework 1 Weighting 25% Coursework Deadline Monday, 29 February 2016, 9:00 AM Late submission will be marked at 0 but will allow a resit opportunity. No submission will be recorded as Absent and no resit opportunity will be offered. Extensions will be in accordance with University policy. Grades You must check that all your coursework marks have been recorded accurately on Moodle and notify your module leader if you believe a mistake has been made. All grades are provisional until confirmed by the Subject Assessment Board. It is possible that notified marks may be raised or lowered by this board. Students are encouraged to keep copies (electronic) of all coursework submitted on this module. Plagiarism Students are advised to consult the University Regulations* and their course handbooks regarding the penalties for and definition of plagiarism, which essentially is the deliberate and substantial insertion in your own work of material from someone else e.g. a published source such as a book or article, or simply another student s piece of work, without acknowledging the extent or source of the quotation. *To view regulations use the University website. Referral Resubmission of assignment, by the Faculty summer re-sit deadline (posted on the module web when date confirmed). Case Study Enclosed Separately Marking Rubrics is shown below Criteria Points 0 1 2 3 4 5 Criteria Weight No attempt Fail Pass Merit Distinction Outstanding Discussion of relevant concepts such as Cost of Capital and Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) in the context of case 20 No attempt A poor description of relevant concepts in the context of case. A poor interpretation of relevant concepts in the context of case. A reasonable description of relevant concepts and a weak or insufficient interpretation of relevant concepts in the context of case. A good description of relevant concepts in the context of case. A sufficient interpretation of relevant concepts in the context of case. An excellent description of relevant concepts in the context of case. A clear interpretation of relevant concepts in the context of case. An outstanding description of relevant concepts, and an excellent interpretation of relevant concepts in the context of case. Application of relevant analytical tools to discuss the price impact on both firms following the news announcement 30 No attempt A poor evaluation. Written analysis, if attempted, is confused. A weak evaluation. Written analysis attempted but lacks depth. A good evaluation. Evaluation is adequate with relevant points being made in the written analysis. An excellent evaluation. A relatively well reasoned discussion/critical evaluation of the results. An outstanding evaluation. Well-reasoned discussion/critical evaluation of the results. Link theories with application and demonstrate critical understanding on the limitation of the theories in the context of case 20 No attempt Very poor discussion. Theories are discussed poorly. The discussions are not coherent. A weak discussion of the theories, explanations are weak with no evidence of wider reading, no justification being given in the discussion. A good discussion of the theories. Theories have been explained and correctly applied. Some evidence of broader reading. Some linkages made between theories and applications. An excellent discussion of the theories. Theories have been explained and critically appraised partly with reference made to appropriate academic research. Relatively strong evidence of broader reading. Good linkages made between theories and applications. An outstanding discussion of the theories. Theories have been explained and critically appraised with reference made to appropriate academic research. Correct application of theory and excellent linkages made between theories and applications. Presentation 10 No attempt Poor presentation weak presentation Good presentation Excellent presentation Outstanding presentation Reference 10 No attempt Poor referencing throughout. No evidence of being able to undertake own research or collect relevant data Weak referencing throughout. Little evidence of being able to undertake own research and collect relevant data Good referencing throughout. Some evidence of being able to undertake own research and collect relevant data Excellent referencing throughout. Adequate evidence of being able to undertake own research and collect relevant data Outstanding referencing throughout. Strong evidence of being able to undertake own research and collect relevant data Class Participation 10 No attempt Little class participation. Weak class participation. Good class participation. Excellent class participation. Outstanding class participation. Total Sum 100


Comments are closed.