identify and explain the BE (break-even point) for Assignment Help

identify and explain the BE (break-even point) for Assignment Help

Strategy and Planning (LLP204) Assessment 2015/2016 Assessment Question and Marking Criteria Group Report Deadline 18 March 2016 Your Task To run your SimVenture for three years. Question Reflect on and discuss the process of running your SimVenture for the first three years of the business. Critically evaluate the strategic decisions you made and the consequences of those decisions for the business. Include material from the lectures and relevant academic literature in your report to support your analysis. Wider reading tends to be associated with higher marks. The report should include the following: The name of the business and details about the management team (group members and university IDs) The unique ID of the game used to create the final report Background information from SimVenture detailing conditions at the starting point of the business. For example the financial position, the market conditions and the competitive environment (in the appendix). Submissions should be a maximum of 25 pages (equivalent to approximately 10,000 words). (excluding references and appendices) Report format An electronic copy must be uploaded via Turnitin to LEARN where it will also be checked for plagiarism Marking Criteria (semester 2) Grade Mark Criteria TopA 80 100 Shows extensive relevant knowledge with evidence of significant independent study and reading. Provides clear and convincing relevant explanations, analysis and arguments. Presents own ideas and explores alternatives. Shows competence in subject specific skills and a willingness to criticise methods and suggest alternative approaches. Achieves excellence in integrating theories/practices as applied to intermediate business problems. A 70 79 Shows extensive relevant knowledge with evidence of significant independent reading. Provides very good relevant explanations, analysis and arguments. Presents a few own ideas and describes alternatives. Shows competence in subject specific skills and is able to criticise methods. Achieves very high level in integrating theories/practices as applied to intermediate business problems. B 60 69 Shows relevant knowledge with evidence of own reading. Provides good relevant explanations, analysis and arguments. Presents some alternatives. Shows competence in subject specific skills. Achieves very high level in integrating theories/practices as applied to intermediate business problems with minor errors/weaknesses. C 50 59 Shows knowledge of relevant core areas with limited evidence of own reading beyond lecture material. Provides some relevant explanations, analysis and arguments. Presents a few weak alternatives. Shows some competence in subject specific skills. Achieves acceptable level in integrating theories/practices as applied to intermediate business problems with some major errors/weaknesses. Marginal Fail 40 49 Shows limited knowledge of relevant key areas, based mainly on lecture material, and limited competence in skills. Provides weak relevant explanations and arguments. Poorly integrates theories/practices when applied to intermediate business problems with major errors/weaknesses. Fail 30 39 Shows patchy and limited knowledge of relevant key areas and partial competence in skills. Achieves little by way of integrating theories/practices as applied to intermediate business problems with major errors/weaknesses. BadFail 0 29 Shows little or confused relevant knowledge of key areas and little competence in skills, with very few relevant applications or examples. Does not express or explain knowledge in own words


Comments are closed.