In which case did the court hold that because the parties

In which case did the court hold that because the parties

1. In which case did the court hold that because the parties were engaged in a social venture and acted under an implied understanding that each would render assistance to the other when either was in a position of peril, to say there was no duty of one to aid the other would be shocking to humanitarian considerations?A Podia v. MairsB DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social ServicesC Farwell v. KeatonD Wakulich v. Mraz2. Of the number of reasons for the laws no duty to rescue rule, which of the following is first and foremost?A There is a lack of causal connection between the defendants conduct and the plaintiffs peril.B The rule is seen as the embodiment of the value placed on individualism in American society. C Concern about the liability question should a number of people fail to render aid.D The difficulty of determining whether someone callously decided not to act or simply froze in the face of an emergency.3. In which case did the court state that the question of whether a duty to affirmatively act is one of judicial balancing of the mix of factors peculiar to each case?A Podias v. MairsB Wakulich v. MrazC Yania v. BiganD Farwell v. Keaton4. The Restatement Third recognizes all of the following relationships that place a defendant under a duty of reasonable care for the plaintiffs safety, including reasonable affirmative efforts to rescue, exceptA landlord tenant.B employer employee.C carrier passenger.D attorney client. 5. In which case did the court reject the argument that a states failure to protect an individual against private violence constitutes a violation of the Due Process Clause?A Yania v. BiganB Podias v. MairsC Wakulich v. MrazD DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services6. Which one of the following statements regarding undertaking to act and reliance is not correct?A Because of discomfort with no-duty rules, courts have been quick to find that a defendant has undertaken to act.B A duty will be found where the defendants unfinished rescue efforts have dissuaded others from helping.C Good Samaritan statutes have been enacted in virtually all jurisdictions.D Under the modern view, once a defendant undertakes to rescue a victim, the plaintiff may discontinue aid so long as the victim is not left in a worse position.7. In which case did the court state that the determination of existence of duty is a question of fairness and public policy?A Wakulich v. MrazB Podias v. MairsC Farwell v. Keaton D Yania v. Bigan


Comments are closed.