Please complete one page single-spaced homework as Custom Research Paper Assistance

Please complete one page single-spaced homework as Custom Research Paper Assistance

General Information about how literature review should be presented Generally, it should SYNTHESISE the RELVANT studies. It should be ANALYTICAL. It Must NOT be DESCRIPTIVE. I mean byrelevant literature that the studies should be related to learning and teaching L2 writing in a foreign language context. However, In my study, I used a mixed methods study. Students questionnaire, students focus groups and individual teacher interviews. Specifically, lit review should cover all important relevant literature be up-to-date provide an insightful analysis of the ideas and conclusions in the literature point out similarities and differences, strengths and weaknesses in the literature identifie gaps in the literature for future research identify the context for which the literature is important. Each paragraph starts with a sentence explaining the subtopic/approach _rst, possibly in contrast with previously mentioned approaches Then, specific references supporting the taken approach are given Each reference should be analyzed briefly pointing to a specific aspect (a solution) and a shortcoming of the work that will be addressed by your research Comparisons between references within the same subtopic should be made. The following should be answered by a literature review: What do we already know in the immediate area concerned? What are the characteristics of the key concepts or the main factors or variables? What are the relationships between these key concepts, factors or variables? What are the complementary existing theories/approaches? Where are the inconsistencies or other shortcomings in our knowledge which these works have not solved? What views need to be (further) tested? What evidence is lacking, inconclusive, contradictory or too limited? Why study (further) the research problem? What contribution can the present study be expected to make? What research designs or methods seem unsatisfactory? In short, Every literature reference should be relevant to the research topic synthesize the information found in the literature to summarize what is known and unknown about the topic identify areas in which there is controversy associated with the literature. analyse and evaluate literature review. e.g the strengths and weakness of the research methods used in the reviewed studies and how my study is different. the gap in the literature and how my study will help in filling the gap common problems Common problems with literature reviews include: List-like writing that lacks synthesis (e.g. Smith (2003) investigated X and found Y. Jones (2000) looked at B and found C. Adams (1995) verified that M causes N. ). This is a bit like giving the reader one piece of a jigsaw puzzle at a time. Your job as a writer is to put all the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle  together and then describe the resulting picture to the reader, pointing out what parts of the picture are clear, what parts are fuzzy, and what parts are missing altogether. You would then identify the goal of your research as being to bring one of the fuzzy areas  into sharper focus , to fill in one of the holes , or to develop the picture into new directions . Not being sufficiently critical Here it is important to note that the purpose of a literature review is not just to summarise what is currently known about a topic, but is also to provide a detailed justification for your research. That is, ultimately it is in the form of an argument, and this argument is developed by pointing out holes  in the jigsaw puzzle that need filling or fuzzy  parts that need clarifying see example 2. It might also put some disparate pieces together which suggest a promising line of research see example 3. As research is supposed to make an original  contribution to human knowledge, one of the things you need to do as a writer is to demonstrate that you are not simply repeating what has already been done before (or if you are, that there is a reason to have some doubt about the previous findings, perhaps as a result of some methodological weakness, thus necessitating the need for a confirmatory study with an improved methodology, or that the previous results are likely to need updating). Thus, as you review the existing literature, you need to identify any limitations, deficiencies, or gaps in existing knowledge or practice that need to be addressed. Not discriminating between relevant and irrelevant materials A literature review is not supposed to simply demonstrate how much you ve read, but provide a description of how certain parts of what you have read provide the foundation for, motivate, and frame your research. As such, the relevance to your thesis of what you review needs to be clear to the reader. With background material , which is important for orientating the reader, it is particularly important to ask: What of this background does the reader really need to appreciate what comes next, and what is trivia or unimportant detail which can be left out?  see example 5. Lack of a clear organisational structure


Comments are closed.